To improve your performance, skills or to gain any promotion in a corporate job, we turn mostly to online training and courses that might heal our weaknesses. Finding a suitable course or training that is a match for your needs and skills isn’t an easy task to do, calculating all odds on your side including schedule, fees, training procedure, and period of training with the ideal course. E.g. If you are a woman and it is hard to become a full-time working professional, you must go for work from home jobs for women. This improves your chances of succeeding in the task.

Evaluation of training programs is essential to put confidence in what you are teaching/learning and be able to reflect, analyze and improvise any aspect of training effectiveness and efficiency.

Why is it Important?

Evaluating any training program be it online or offline has perks, for example getting a diploma in online training has its perks as the flexibility of work hours, place, and time. Training evaluation is a checkpoint for the cost-effectiveness of training and gaps in between the training comes with some benefits, some of the signs are listed below.

A. Accountability
Getting your needs clear is the way to ensure accountability of your course, setting your goals, comparing your needs and course, and the outcomes of the comparison. We offer no compromise on deliverables of course at eMaester.

B.Transparency of Feedback
Evaluation of course also needs a transparent feedback mechanism, by which you and the coordinator can communicate. More transparent feedback makes our course enterprise-friendly, contouring loopholes in training, changes in methodology, and implementation of changes are possible to handle.

C.Cost-Effectiveness of Training
The high return of investment (ROI) of our training to ensure value for your money, ensuring quality training in your budget.

Tools to Evaluate a Training Program

There are many tools and tricks to evaluate your training course. Some of them are listed below as –

A.The Kirkpatrick Taxonomy Model-
It is a widely used four-level comprehensive strategy to evaluate any training program’s effectiveness and efficiency.

Level 1 Reaction: Level to measure participants’ initial reaction to understand and gain knowledge of the training program, valuable insights of quality of program, educator, and material or more.

Level 2 Learning: To measure the absorbance of knowledge and map of study objectives.

Level 3 Behavior: Measurement of how much training program affected your behavior and how you are applying the knowledge in real life.

Level 4 Results: Analyzing the impact of the training program on the business level and making sure to tie it to individual programs.

B. The Phillips ROI Model
This method is very similar to Kirkpatrick’s model and has an extra step to calculate the ROI of training. Gives the formula to calculate the ROI of training.

Procedure to calculate ROI:
●Collect pre-training data – This data acts as a baseline to calculate the metrics before and after training.
●Collect post-training data – This data acts as a topline to calculate metrics before and after training programs.
●Isolate the effect of training programs – This step involves all improvements that are caused by training and collection of all factors contributing to the improvement of performance.
●Convert data to monetary gains – Converting your performance into monetary gain with the above-collected data, to measure the final return of investment.
●Calculate ROI – Formula for calculation of ROI

ROI = Net Programme Benefits/ Programme Cost * 100

In case net benefits of the program exceed the program cost, making it a great investment. Whether if it is not the case then your training is less productive for your investment.

C.Summative and Formative Evaluation
The unique thing about this method is that you can evaluate the training program while it’s developing, while that is not the case with the above two methods, they can be only applied after a successful compilation of course or training.

C.a. Formative Method of Evaluation
Procedure –
1.Reviewing materials with fellow training.
2.Using the material similar to that of training to see the impact.
3.Group discussion with trainees to get feedback.
4.Assessment of materials with supervisors who oversee the trainees.\
H4.C.b. Summative Method of Evaluation

Procedure –
1.Testing trainees for the grasp of knowledge in training.
2.Collecting opinions from trainees, after the training was conducted.
3.Post-training check on production and quality of work that has been accomplished.
4.Conducting surveys and interviews with trainees to understand what they learned.

Why Choose eMaester?

At eMaester we always try to give you the best of us. To evaluate the certification of the programs they regularly get feedback from their students.

1)Using The Kirkpatrick Taxonomy Model, they have an amazing response from their students, to make sure of better learning and absorbance we train our class into 1:3 batch and regular doubt solving sessions. More than 1200 plus trainer forces have trained and worked with us successfully, making our program more and more powerful.
2)According to Philip’s ROI model, they have a great return of investment, we strive to make sure that you are employed after the training is completed and certification is offered. We also do a summative and formative evaluation which includes individual training evaluation as well as mass evaluation. We always try to get constant feedback on our training programs to ensure high productivity.
3)Regardless of the models, what makes eMaester distinctive than other online courses is the availability of of 6 in-house brands. Post their certification, trainers can choose which brand they want to train for. They don’t have to hunt for students as students under each brand are readily available to learn.

In Nutshell – Evaluation of training programs is finding drawbacks in your training course and improvising the performance based on the ROI. It is essential to increase the quality of work, conclude overall training effectiveness, and boost the optimism in employees at eMaester.

Each of the above-given methods and models has its advantages and disadvantages, to find out the ideal method you need to carefully observe the needs and priorities of the individual training programs, such as STEM training and communication training evaluation could be evaluated by various methods but there will be a specific method that suits the evaluation most for a particular course.

There are variables according to which your choice of method or model may change, the variable includes time, availability of resources, budget, and other personal factors such as flexibility of course.

At eMaester we counter almost every variable such as flexibility of time and course, the vast availability of resources, and high ROI to ensure your budget reimbursement.

To make sure evaluation is free of bias, collecting data from pre and post-training may be much help. To improve your evaluation result, we input real and genuine information that gives very accurate results, to verify whether the training program is worth it or not.